Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Venkatesh Rao's avatar

I normally throw rocks at people who talk about “systems” because it is usually abstract cybernetics nonsense, but this is good. The right way to “do” systems is object level and phenomenological first, abstraction later or never.

Re efficiency, familiar with hollnagel’s ETTO principle? If not look it up. Thoroughness has now become my preferred lead design vector over efficiency.

Expand full comment
Connell Locke's avatar

I thoroughly enjoyed this.

Perhaps it's implicit, but one theme you don't dive into, is embedding 'systems thinking' as a mindset, especially for funders/governments. You touched on it with the Apollo example, where institutions will begrudgingly fund something open-ended, but isn't *everything* we care about, a system (energy, climate, intelligence, manufacturing, inequality, security)? It feels like if that message were really to sink-in, it would be the first domino.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts